A blind second opinion requires the second physician to see you under the same circumstances as the first physician. In other words, the second physician does not have access to the notes and records of the first physician. This process ensures that the first physician’s findings and recommendations do not influence the second physician.
In theory, a blind second opinion is the best way to obtain the opinion. In reality, it may not be possible. The second physician may require your previous records. And if your first physician is making the referral, he may speak with the second physician about your condition. One of the disadvantages of a blind second opinion is that doctor number two may not be able to tell you why his opinion is different without knowing the basis of the first doctor’s opinion. Some hospitals such as Yale-New Haven Hospital suggest another option—that you provide test results, x-rays, and other information without including the first doctor’s written diagnosis and treatment recommendation.
Ruthann Russo, PhD, JD, MPH, RHIT, is a healthcare expert with more than 20 years of experience working in and advising healthcare organizations.
